Page 9 of 10

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 11th, 2013, 3:55 pm
by Venexis
WELP.

TIL I could have voted two more times.

Oh well, I think that less categories is still the only way anything is going to be resolved over a length of time.

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 11th, 2013, 4:11 pm
by CedarBranch
Less awards. After processes of enlightenment, I agree/think that we don't need so many categories. There really aren't that many active members that "qualify," after I took a gander.

Restricting the number of awards a person can get. I don't think we want to take any chances that one user may take too many. We want a fair game.
I'm not totally sure how we'd restrict fairly, but maybe the category you're most popular in would be the only one you'd be able to run for.

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 11th, 2013, 4:40 pm
by Venexis
My reasoning behind less categories was that then medals would have some level of worth behind them. Only a select group of people would receive one (or rarely two) every six months, and it would be a sort of congratulations to them for being outstanding in the area they won.

Contrasted with our previous system, in which only a select group of people DID NOT receive any medals. In this sort of system, where almost everyone wins and only a few lose, medals have no value. We're praising so many people for so many things that it's virtually not praise at all, just a giant "♥♥♥♥ you" to the few people who walked away with nothing.

That needs to change.

Maybe I'll go through the current list of categories and see what can be done.

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 11th, 2013, 9:42 pm
by nin10mode
Venexis wrote:WELP.

TIL I could have voted two more times.

Oh well, I think that less categories is still the only way anything is going to be resolved over a length of time.

Incase you change your mind, this poll has the option to revote.

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 12th, 2013, 3:58 am
by Karyete
Actually, on second thoughts, I suppose taking a couple of awards away wouldn't do much harm. We have tons of them to dish out...so it's too easy to get one.
I only voted for one option though...
Says the guy without a single one :3

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 14th, 2013, 12:38 am
by Megar
end thy poll this instant
i think everyone's already made their opinion

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 14th, 2013, 7:18 am
by nin10mode
I gave it a week in hopes of the vote count differences being greater. I can't go one way just because it has one or two more votes. I want the majority to decide. Sorry that it's delaying it even further. Naturally, if enough people want to start already, we can.

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 17th, 2013, 1:39 pm
by *Emelia K. Fletcher
I'm fairly sure at this point RV is in a good place to start -- are "restrict awards" and "less awards" mutually exclusive?

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 17th, 2013, 3:01 pm
by MessengerOfDreams
I'd assume so. If there's only, like, 10 awards, there's no way anyone's gonna get more than 3.

Re: Runouw Votes Discussion

PostPosted: July 17th, 2013, 10:53 pm
by Megar
Poll ended start now