I'm confused about the reasons some members are permabanned and yet some are not.
Here's the thing- some users have been known to get past a permaban since the mods liked them better, case in point, GalaxyMario. He only got a month, which was in the end shortened, for reregistering. TBG got a reprieve similar to this due to rallying, but the only reason he would have gotten a permaban was because of other offenses coupled up with his rereg.
The mods assume that Kirby859 rereg's without asking and Permaban him
WHA-WHA-WHAT?!
If you favortise due to activity, well, Kirby859 was twice as active as GalaxyMario was. So why the permaban? Well, it got corrected, but still...
And the same has happened with Reaper and would have happened with itoofast. If they don't get the mercy some other members have, then is that to say that Itoofast and Reaper weren't good enough members? Doesn't really sound right...
Or maybe you're just getting less and less lenient.
But my opinion is, what you did to spare GalaxyMario was right. If he was a good member (And this was his first offense) Maybe they should show a bit of mercy. (BTW what is the big deal about rereg's?) Don't get me wrong, TBG is a great member, and the best recovery of a ban, but based on his track record, he in all respects should have been given a perma because back then he had a number of other offenses. I think if a member is active and good, then he should only get a 1 or 2 month ban THE FIRST TIME ONLY.
Equation I am getting at-
Good Behavior+Activity+Rereg=Mercy
Bad Behavior-Activity+Rereg=Death
Am I making sense?














