I recently came into conflict with some of my collegues who support the "Austism Rights Movement" (wiki has a nicely objective article, for those of you who are unaware:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_rights_movement), as I was claimed to be ultimately eugenic is saying that autism and similar conditions should be removed when such techniques become possible.
My answer to them relied heavily on the same principles of transhumanism - if something, 'normally present' or not, causes an individual to suffer unfairly, how can one claim a progressive approach by advocating its presence?
Their argument is also flawed on a factual level. I once looked into a study conducted by ESE into autistic salvants, the goal being to identify what gave them mathematical prowess on a genetic scale and then discuss how it would be possible to isolate and replicate the effect in non-autistic individuals. The conclusion gave a genetic overview of the results, and it clearly stated that the conditions required to create autism are epigenetic (i.e. enviromental), and that the rise in autism can be called a direct effect of the degradation of the enviroment caused by human activity - this explains why autism seems to be far more prevalent in industrial nations.
I have known many autistic individuals, and have yet to meet one who enjoyed his or her condition. Some claim attempting to remove autism because it results in individual discomfort would be the equalivalent of ethnic cleansing performed against a group which is discriminated against, as doing such will result in an end of the discrimination. What these critics and pseudo-progressives fail to realize is that such an analogy merely reflects an imperfect species - thus, they unknowingly advocate transhumanism to clean up the base problems by pointing out said problems.
As for the Autism Rights Movement, I join those who point out the only ones who want all treatment for autism ended, and the condition recognized as entirely normal, are universally high and very high performing autistics. I have yet to hear of anyone handicapped to the point where they cannot interact, have severe cognitive difficulties, e.t.c. state that they believe they should be left alone, and autism should not be cured. While my expertise in psychology is limited, I would dare to say that such bantering from high performing autistics is a Freudian attempt to belay a deeper sense of inferority with excess external narcissism - and at the expense of all other autistics, I might add.