Harmless wrote:It could be plausible. I mean the lack of explosives thing as Kimonio mentioned is something that really needs to be considered when you think something is a bomb.
I think I need to point out that school staff and probably basic policemen do not have knoweledge in explosives ad did have the right to worry. Seeing the case, I think some gunpowder/grenade explosive or any other small amount of other kind of explosives can be put there, hidden somewhere in the case and then triggered by a part of the circuit when electricity comes through it. It can happen, if you don't know, always keep guard up. Give that device to me, and I'd take the possibility of having an exploding matterial in here as pretty likely. Whenether the authorities had knoweledge in the domain or not doesn't change how they handled the situation.
Regarding the part about being a fraud and plagiated clock, well first I think the massive publicity, gifts and sympathy the kid god is frankly ridiculous. I mean damn he just throwed some ♥♥♥♥ there and got in trouble, ok some folks got his kid's back for being innocent, but that doesn't mean he should be praised like a national hero and instead we should focus on investigating if there are other cases like this and support the other victims like we did here. Second he is just 14th, I don't expect him to make great inventions and frankly you cannot make a clock without clock parts which are taken from, wait for it, other clocks. Yes, maybe he just took a clock and throwed it into a case, but in the process of doing it, he may have adapted the case to the clock parts, disamble and re-asamble certain parts of the circuits and checking if it works. This is not necessary a part of brightness or inovation, but learning. Disambling that circuits, he may have understood how they work, which part is what and how they can be replicated. In 5th grade at physics, the teacher provided us batteries, metalic cables and lightbulbs and by connecting them, we made the bulb glow. Was it new? Was it innovative? Was it an invention? No, no and no. Then why did we do that? For the sake for learning, for understanding how the electricity travels from the circuit, how the most simple circuit works and in time, by adding more components, we made them more and more complex. This kid may have a knack for electricity and he is willing to learn, I wouldn't call him a bright inventor, but I'd praise his willing to learn.