~Zero wrote:There's the saying that "Ignorance is bliss". So if the truth is that everything is a conspiracy, and that "you are not safe", then I prefer to be the most ignorant ♥♥♥♥ in the world, and just live on. because that makes me happy. If my goals are unrealistic or not, if I'm "disprivileged" or not, I don't ♥♥♥♥ care. I might as well die trying to accomplish my goals rather than just sitting down and complaining about the whole "conspiracy" around me.
Harmless wrote:Some of the things I think education systems (especially the one in the United States) miss out on is critical thinking, and thinking with your own brain and logical pathfindings. As a result, many of us simply accept information and one-sided arguments without any rebuttal or questioning the legitimacy of said argument.
Now that both of you guys have mentioned it I have a real-life example to this. I have a friend, who if you just mention something even slightly controversial (to him at least) will start and speak for hours about masons, "The Secret Library of Vatican" and a bunch of all this ♥♥♥♥, claiming he is one of the few who only ask this questions and are aware that "the world is rigged".
Me and my other friends have agreed to not argue with him, but quietly agree that all this is ♥♥♥♥. First off, as Harmless mentioned, we need to work on critical thinking. Most conspirationists will claim that they think for themselves and know more than the average sheep, but ironically it's exactly the opposite. I saw a lot of people spreading the same ideas. Not even changed, exactly the same, all hate about masons, templars, secret satanist and Vatican mafia I heard the exact same thing from various people, which lead me to believe that actually, none of those people actually thought for themselves. There was one guy who started the idea/concept and spread it, and those people just caught it for whatever reason, maybe because it sounded powerful, maybe because they thought they might be above average if they believe in, could be because of any reason at all. My point is, they didn't take the "normal" life, or the
status quo if you wish as granted because they thought it's suspicious and claimed that they need to think for themselves, but instead took the exact opposite side of the bridge as granted, which makes no difference at all thinking-wise.
Through my life I've been exposed to various mentalities, concepts, doctrines and so on. I believed and some and opposed others (in case they opposed my initial beliefs if they were strongly rooted into my brain), but as years passed and I matured, I started to do a revision of what I heard of and believed till that moment and noticed that a lot of those doctrines or beliefs didn't actually characterise me, didn't apply to me or didn't touch me at all. I just believed some because I took them as granted. It's like someone gave me a book and instead of reading it to determine whenether I like it or not, I just put it on the shelf and tell everyone who passes by how great the book is,
only because it looks good. I'm not a master of analogies, but I hope you got the idea. In essence, I was trying to point the "juding the book by the cover" thing and how easily we can make assumptions of concepts based on how greatly they are presented to us.
I said something about maturing earlier. I'm not going to ask for your age, nor mention any age as some people mature earlier or later than others, but regardless, if you haven't started already (and I'm not implying you didn't), you will at some point. You will begin to ask yourself questions and find suitable answers for yourself, you are building your character, just be careful what is shaping that character. One critical element is education and as Harmless said, some people are never taught to ask questions, in this case you have additional work to do in this journey and that is teaching yourself to ask questions.