24murph wrote:Well... Err... They are funning but well, if you don't want to read the extreme feedback in invisible text under this post, then don't...
Well, first off, this is none-thing that I can't do under about three minutes, or less. The hardest part too do is to probably search for the images over the internet and copy them into MS Paint, O_X . Now, they are funny but EXTREMELY cheap and simple to make. If you would ever wanna take the new bigger, more awesome step to be making EPIC Wacky Picture Put-together, I would recommend getting something that can do more then just, well, none-thing really, like Gimp 2.0 (Like Abode's Photoshops, expect Free) or one of Adobe's Photoshops (I would recommend one of the Elements, but it is pricey, O_X)
Anyway, hoped this invisible feedback helped!
First off, I have to say that you are absolutely right. These pictures are very easy to make and resemble hardly any work done to them. And if I may point out something from the first post:
blablob wrote:Yeah. Now you know why I don't call myself an artist.
Really. I can't draw to save my life. I like to spend as little of the time as possible actually
crafting anything. I just can't do it.
That's not to say I don't like art. I love art. I would like to be a video-game designer some day. That's art. But God (Or Yah, for MOY) knows I won't be drawing anything.
So instead of spending countless time drawing a picture I know won't even come out right, I make a quick picture--about 5 to 10 minutes per pic--and make them humorous. It has a sense of humor to it, and overall entertaining. Does it really matter how "Good" or "Proffesional" it looks? (Who's that remind you of? *CoughNintendoCough*