Woah woah woah, what on earth is happening here? /referring to the last few pages.
The reality is with judging is that you get peoples opinions from them. Bias is where judging comes into play. If someone like you plays a level and gives it a good/bad score, then you know you're going to enjoy/dislike it. However, because we choose judges so randomly, this doesn't necessarily work for each level. So to fix this we can have a set of approved judges, of which they are then chosen from to fit their most desired theme.(Moy, you mentioned me earlier about bias in story levels. I'd like to point out here that it's not story levels that take down marks, but the lack of flow because of all the signs. But some seem to enjoy them (who knows why.. ;D).)
MessengerOfDreams wrote:Moral of the story: Never try anything new or unusual again, always react negatively to anything outside of the norm, puzzle levels are no longer relevant, and scores run officially on bias now.
While this isn't entirely fair, you do have a point. Though maybe not the point you wanted to make. SM63 has an established framework, and doing things outside the norm is great, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's any good or works within SM63. The problem is that you don't have full freedom over how the game works, which means different types of levels don't work as well with the tone as the norm do. Yes, there are exceptions, as there will always be, but that doesn't mean that because they are different that they should be praised.
Some advice to those wanting different types of levels: use LL. Yes, it may be in an early version of beta(and hopefully updated in the coming weeks), but it can do wonders more than SM63, and allow you to do all this newfangled experiments with puzzles and switches and whathaveyou. It doesn't have an established framework, it doesn't have a set flow. You have no expectations of what the level will be like, so you can do whatever you like.
Feel free to add to the discussion (please no flaming guys), as this might help shape future LDCs. I can't guarantee I'll reply, but hey, if we can get better run LDCs later on then yay.
Oh, and Merry Christmas guys! :D