Page 128 of 129

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: October 18th, 2016, 9:07 pm
by ~Yuri
Like your other sigs, it's pretty good. The blood-red behind the "R" really does stand out in the monochromatic sig. The only complaint imo, is that the background image looks a little inconsistent: Some parts seem to have a really low resolution, while others are normal, and that is pretty not good.

So, 7/10. It's pretty good as always, but I think you've done better before.

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: October 27th, 2016, 4:16 pm
by Karyete
A collection of high-quality and interesting sigbars, and a little mention for Astra. Not flashy, but not bland. Very pleasing to look at :3. 9/10

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: October 27th, 2016, 4:38 pm
by npromin1
I like the contrasts of colors in the image and the way they blend. I like how it's nice and compact.

7.6/10

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: October 28th, 2016, 9:25 pm
by Positron
There's not really that much in the sig (yeah im a hypocrite). The sneak peak is cool, but I would enjoy some good formatting, a sigbar, links, etc. 4.7/10

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: October 28th, 2016, 10:02 pm
by Vajrin
This skeleton picture is too big and a bit weird. I recommend you to resize it. 4.5/10

EDIT: okies you resized it and it's a lot better so I'll rate 6.5/10 instead.

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: November 3rd, 2016, 10:48 am
by ~Yuri
I'm a big fan of the whole black and white thing. Though, it just doesn't look too right there. It's not that it's monochromatic: It's because some parts of the sig could stand out more. Your username for example: it could have been white instead of black, so it doesn't blend TOO well with the background.

That being said, it is not tiresome to look at, and aside from this particular nitpick, it's a pretty sigbar. 7/10

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: November 4th, 2016, 7:27 pm
by Charcoal
Starry space night sky and good contrast in colors is an A+ to me. 10/10

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: November 6th, 2016, 5:49 pm
by l.m
Pretty big, and almost unecessarily so, as there aren't as much elements taking over the signature area. Basic, but tries to be dark and it works, though not memorable. Could be more worked on; as of now it just feels pretty bland. 6.5/10

My sig is randomized btw, watch yourself

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: January 4th, 2017, 8:33 pm
by Asterocrat
There is not much to say here, it's just too immaculate. Each picture is symmetrical and takes up the entire length of the post, and as a result, your sig is extremely visually pleasing. The fact that it's randomized is just added value, making your sig even less boring. My favourite part has to be the picture with the sign, I'm not sure why... It might be the messed up words in the middle :P
Bonus points for the [award] BBCode, taking me back when everyone had one in their sig

A solid A+, 10/10

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: January 5th, 2017, 3:37 pm
by Doram
Hey, SK Very nice old-timey star charts. Two thumbs up.

Yuri is wasum, because he made these for me, and he asked me to post here for your appreciation. It's on a slow rotation, so here's all 4 panels separate.

Image
Image
Image
Image