Page 129 of 129

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: January 5th, 2017, 3:43 pm
by Karyete
I definitely like the simplicity of these - each one having only a few main colours looks good, but there's also variety between the four. Incorporating SM63/LL is a nice touch - Mario's sprite doesn't look fantastic up close but that's not really something kn your control.

Personally I don't like the 3rd sigbar's colour scheme, but that's purely an opinion and not a criticism of the quality. 4th one looks fantastic.

11/10 Yuri you broke the damn scale

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: March 11th, 2017, 4:47 am
by Maaaaarrrrriiiiio
Karyete your sig is cool because I like dark colors, same for your avatar, 9.99/10. ;P
But I don't have any images for my sig......

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: April 17th, 2017, 7:24 am
by ~Yuri
Well, it IS very simple. Not visually appealing at all, but serves its purpose I guess. The quote is okay, but again, it's a sig that lacks a "sig", if I make any sense. 3/10.

Alright, you know what? I'll make you one. I've been missing doing these, and you really need one.

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: April 17th, 2017, 4:03 pm
by Vajrin
0/10 where's artsa


jk it's 9/10 because I think your original Astra sig is better

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: September 17th, 2017, 5:52 am
by John
8/10 your sig was made perfectly though it is just a screenshot in SM63.
At least much better than mine.

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: September 17th, 2017, 8:03 am
by Forgotten
Your sig's alright... at least the white text looks decent on the dark background. But it kinda looks like it was made with a logo generator.
As for the content within the spoiler tags, Engrish aside, I'm not really fond of the formatting because I think you're overusing the font size BBCodes.
Not too shabby. 5.5/10.

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: September 17th, 2017, 9:16 am
by l.m
Real neat collection of drawn characters; tells more about you and your stuff, even though a small username instance anywhere could be a nice touch. I just don't like how contrasting the characters are compared with the background, and you really need to smoothen out those lines. Maybe I'd go even far and adjust the perspective of the characters so it doesn't look like they're just pasted over each other. Bonus points for having a recollection of works in spoiler tags, though.

Overall, organized sig. 7/10

now can you solve the captcha below

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: September 17th, 2017, 11:00 am
by Venexis
I don't have any art experience but I do have a bit of experience with codes, so

l.m wrote:even though a small username instance anywhere


Is technically incorrect. I'm pretty sure the top right is a Morse code translation of his username and... maybe a site? To be honest I can't resolve it into any recognizable word off the top of my head. I really dig it.

But hey since I'm here I'll take a whack at yours, FF. It spells out your lemontea, which although your name, isn't what I'm gonna call you (<3) and would probably do a pretty solid job preventing bots. That being said, I just... don't get it. It's probably supposed to be like, symbolic and stuff but honestly it comes off looking slightly messy and more like a crude experimental piece than a representation of anything. Maybe that's the point, in which case I can totally respect that, but... I just don't find it appealing. It is a pretty neat theme, though, especially in conjunction with your avatar. 6.5/10.

Re: Rate the above user's signature

PostPosted: September 17th, 2017, 11:08 am
by l.m
Venexis wrote: I'm pretty sure the top right is a Morse code translation of his username and... maybe a site? To be honest I can't resolve it into any recognizable word off the top of my head. I really dig it.


the vision it took for one notice that holy damn