Whoa whoa, this topic hugely exploded.
I'm now unsure on what to do if Harm has dropped out of judging. I also don't want to make a poll in case people are biased.
May I request that Harm just send me the judgings he's done via PM (if he's done any) and I'll still judge Shroom's and that's it. This Halloween forum needs to be graveyarded very soon.
Memento Mori Inc. wrote:Wasn't he suppose to be banned if he kept being an ♥♥♥ like 5 assitries ago?
Since now and the last time he was an '♥♥♥' he'd actually been a good member. And the last time he was an '♥♥♥' he apologised, and as pretty much all the arguments suggest, it is just clash of opinion and morals.
I'll admit, I'm not impressed.
These are all split up into purely selfish/selfless reasons. Shroom doesn't want his level judged 'unfairly', but the truth is, low scores WILL be handed out if a judge feels that level deserves their score. The sad truth is, I could not imagine him ever complaining about the judging system if it weren't for his ambitious series placing low. It's quality over quantity, okay, and that needs to be learned. If you believe your level is worthy of a high score, it still doesn't mean everyone will. It's about taste. I love graphically pleasing levels, others love simplistic platforming levels. It's subjective okay, as we're all humans in this together we're never going to find a system that isn't and I'd rather not change anything and risk ♥♥♥♥ up all the scores in existence ever.
Sigh.
Now, I think everyone has got it out of their system, including me, we'll be quieter and more respectful to each other now.