runouw.com

yeah chillax peoplz; in other words, ovidiu, you shouldn't take lag and loading times too much into account when rating, compared to the overall effort; and if you didn't know, high loading time comes from both size and the amount of plants in a level, so if you really care about décor and good graphics, you might have a loading time. On the other side, if your computer can't load a level that large, install the download version if you didn't already (scroll at bottom of http://runouw.com/games/sm63) and load it there. And some patience is worth it if you're rewarded with a level of marvellous effort. (And if the flames bring you on low health, you should find enough coins to survive. With some intuition you can even distinguish the disabled flames from the others. Again, not much of a problem)

Also if you want to emphasize problems / bugs on other levels, please don't rage, since raging doesn't help in any way, but being respectful does.

Goldy301 wrote:we rate only for the graphics,cutoff etc.

lol "etc." contains some things, it's the overall quality that is to be rated

Supershroom wrote:high loading time comes from both size and the amount of plants in a level, so if you really care about décor and good graphics, you might have a loading time.

Which, more often than not, is worth it. The tiny score you lose in loading times is more than made up for in graphical content.

(this doesn't just apply to contests btw)

Wow. You have some really good designing skills.
I'm really impressed. Maybe I ought to look at what else you've created for inspiration.
I gave you a 5 btw

Thanks DarkBlaze.

Goldy301 wrote:@ovidiu2007 This level was made by FL and he did a great job with a lot of effort in it. We do not rate low stars on a level that we hate,we rate only for the graphics,cutoff etc. Btw,you said 3 ☆☆☆ but you rated 2 ☆☆.

Sorry but I got easy

The thing with ☆: I was wrong

SORRY

You can still fix it, just click on the stars again.