Avolerators wrote:Yeah...thanks for that terrible review on my sig, BT.
Nah, you don't know why this score? "cyber-butt" would look bad to me to get someone's attention to your forums. Same as StarF. Also "Dear God" (this part is deleted, got a warning for this part)... Try to wish to God whatever you want, not talk to him. The rest is okay.
MessengerOfDreams wrote:Bleh. Religious overload from BT.
Dunno what you mean by "overload"...
Anyways, I have a sig to rate:
First: The picture. Very nice. You will never quit posting when you're on runouw.com. Extreme!
Second: The first spoiler. Tried to make a URL using all images included??? Try copying the URL BBcode for every separate image. Anyways, good spoiler.
Third: The second spoiler. The quotes differ in awesomeness, the first is okay but the second...(deleted this part, got that warning for this part too)
Fourth: The third and last spoiler. Nothing but URLs advertising (advertising in your sig is alright, maybe as mentioned in the rules in Rules forum? Or I'm false about advertising in teh sig?) your FreeForums, Blogspot and wherever the 3
rd URL takes to.
Overall (Same as rating Avo's sig): The first gets 24/25, the second gets 14/25, the third gets 9/25, while the fourth gets 12.5/25.
So, the overall rating, after calculating, is...
66%!Which means 6.6/10. Nice, but the second and third spoilers affected your overall rating, but the picture outta-the-spoilers you posted is extreme. Remove Avo's quote in your sig that-looks-bad-to-me and you get higher than 72%, although anything I rate against my religion will be under 2/5 the rating. But nice sig there.
EDIT: The parts deleted gave me one warning