Art Rules

[Raz]

I'm going to say it's okay as long as you give warning.

[Oranjui]

Might add a clause:

i

On NSFW content: Artwork that involves gore, nudity, violence, or other generally "not safe for work" (NSFW) content is by all means allowed, but expect to be given a warning if you do not clearly mark the content as such. If your thread as a whole is usually clean, then make sure you use [sp.oiler] BBCode and mark it as nsfw. Otherwise, if you plan to post a thread containing mostly or exclusively nsfw content of any form (text, graphics, audio, video, etc), just add an nsfw or trigger warning tag in the title so we know before opening it; in that case, you don't need to collapse the content into a spoiler because we already know what it is.

Could probably be worded better and I might be missing something, so post suggestions for revisions or I'll just add this to the OP in a few days if everyone's cool with that

[Oranjui]

That's kind of hard to answer because it seems like a really mild thing to hide/censor, but at the same time, having that seen on your computer screen at work/school would be a little bit questionable. I guess I'd say, as a rule of thumb, if you don't know whether it's nsfw or not, just put it in a spoiler anyway.

edit: ok I guess the post I'm responding to was deleted

[Charcoal]

Oh, sorry OJ. In case anyone is confused, I asked if something like a shirtless, muscular guy or a girl in a swimsuit was considered nsfw.
Sorry about deleting it. I thought it was such a minor question.

[Oranjui]

OP is updated again, back and better than ever with all new formatting and extra rules to complicate your lives! /s (I mostly just cleaned it up, and then added the nsfw rule along with a note about spoofs)

[Doram]

I fixed the padding. I'm a helper.

[Charcoal]

Now that we have some better art rules and guidelines to go by, should this go back to being locked again?