Rate the above user's signature

[PositronWildhawk]

A very solid FF sigbar, made christmasy by tinting it blue lawl
9.5/10

[l.m]

Solid sig. I like the symmetry, though the colors don't for well imo. 6/10

[Raz]

10/10
Perfectly organized signature, I'm not a fan of the signature on it's own, but in the holiday forums it fits really nicely.
I like the info about you
and loving dogs i something i can respect

[NathanBros]

6/10

The drawings are great, but could use more colors then green tones.

[PositronWildhawk]

5/10, very boring like before but slightly improved with that screenshot. The use of no center tags irks me for some reason, too.

[Oranjui]

Raz: Colours work well, it's clean, it's concise, it's eye-catching but not overly so. However, there's also really not much of note. Peridot gets you a +1 though. 8/10

NathanBros: Not exactly sure what you're going for with this. Does the screenshot represent you in some way, or is it just a fun image you put in your sig just because? It's cute, though. The textual part is fine, if a little bland. Also, the whole thing could probably benefit from use of [center] tags. 5/10

PositronWildhawk: Your main sig image is really ♥♥♥♥ huge and it's kind of an eyesore, to put it bluntly. The image is grainy, the colours don't really work, the font is kind of gross-looking. The other images inside the spoiler are similarly grainy-looking, and they look like you just went to some sig creator site or some "put text on image" site or something instead of using a proper image editor to make an interesting sig (or asking someone else to make one for you). Also, your twitter hardly has any posts, so I'm not sure why you linked it, and the rest of the text in the sig doesn't really make any sense and you could do without it completely. I'm probably missing a reference with the last line but tbh the whole thing looks kind of just like you're trying to be funny by being "random". I'll give a 2/10 for effort, because you actually did format it decently, and that's pretty respectable.

[Supershroom]

Looks very professional. Misses maybe one touch of fancyness but still 9.5/10.

[l.m]

It's not very different from your past sig - though the stuff inside your spoiler is definitely interesting. I also like Nan's sig. 7.5/10

[Magnen]

Impressive art, some sections slightly irk me for some reason, though

still 8/10

[Oranjui]

Simplistic and clean. Plus the artwork is great (<3 ya LF). It's got relevant links, too, and the text colours work really well with the image. The one thing that bothers me is the asymmetry of the lines due to the one at the top that's automatically added to the end of every post. To balance that, I'd probably just add a second one at the very end. In any case, this is overall really good-looking. 9/10

-----------
Aaaallllssoooo this is kind of late and I'm probably being a little hypocritical but I just want to say something.

This is a thread where people usually want specific feedback on their artwork and their formatting/organization skills. I'm glad people have been a lot better about obeying rule #3 in the OP lately (providing context for their score), but it would be extremely helpful if people could elaborate on said context as well.

Yes I'm looking at you

though the colors don't for well imo.

Misses maybe one touch of fancyness

some sections slightly irk me for some reason, though